Legal Opinion

People v. Lindsay

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1989No. F010030PublishedCited by 10 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (G. A.), J. *

Though defendant was charged in count one with robbery (Pen. Code, §211), 1 and count two with violating Vehicle Code section 10851 (auto theft), the jury returned a verdict of guilty of misdemeanor battery (§ 242) on count one and could not arrive at a verdict on count two, resulting in a mistrial as to count two.

One of several prior felonies used to impeach defendant was a conviction of a battery upon a police officer (§ 243, subd. (c)), which occurred in 1986.

Later, pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant pled guilty to violating Vehicle Code section 10851 (auto…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. People v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Galeana-Mendoza v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. People v. ChavezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API