Legal Opinion

Ex Parte AmSouth Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1999No. 1972308PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AmSouth Bank, the defendant in an action pending in the Mobile Circuit Court, petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the circuit court to grant AmSouth's motion to dismiss that action on the ground that that court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. AmSouth argues that the circuit court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction of the pending action because that action is the second action seeking class certification filed involving the same parties and substantially similar claims. We do not direct the circuit court to dismiss the action, but we do issue a writ directing the circuit court to put…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Equity Resources Management, Inc. v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Ex Parte First Nat. Bank of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Terrell v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. First Tennessee Bank v. SnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte the Boc Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Shawnee Terminal Railroad v. J.E. Estes Wood Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Ex Parte Speedee Cash of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Ex Parte AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ex Parte the Boc Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API