Legal Opinion

Shaughnessy v. Director General of Railroads

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1922No. Appeal, No. 180PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

On April 13,1918, plaintiff was a passenger on defendant’s train. He was seated in a Pullman car which was derailed while passing through Centre County, and as a result was seriously hurt. Investigation, made after the accident, disclosed a rail broken into six parts, and a spreading of the track for some distance, likely due to the shifting of the ties when the coach was overturned. Suit was brought to recover damages, and, upon the trial, evidence was offered to show the relation of claimant to the company at the time his injury was received, and the amount of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Holzheimer v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. McCafferty v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Lonzer v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Meier v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Elder v. Lykens Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hartig v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Rozmajzl v. Northland Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Callas v. Independent Taxi Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  4. Grimes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Elia v. OlszewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API