Hyman v. Karl Stern Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lewis R. Works, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover on two counts for amounts of salary alleged, to be unpaid to her by the defendant corporation. Judgment was in her favor, and defendant has appealed.
It was shown in evidence that, about the 1st of April, 1917, Karl Stern, who was then conducting a business similar to that which was and theretofore had been engaged in by the plaintiff, proposed to the plaintiff that she consolidate her business with that of Stern. The terms of consolidation were agreed upon and the defendant corporation was formed and shares issued in the proportion of ten to Stern and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Hyman v. SternCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Graves v. A. Graves Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
- Hyman v. Karl Stern Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923