Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bakos v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 2011Published

1Dissent

Peradotto, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent because I agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in denying its motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7). Plaintiff commenced this action seeking, inter alia, a declaration that defendant is “obligated to perform its obligation under the [homeowners’ insurance p]olicy” that it issued to plaintiff. According to plaintiff, defendant was obligated to provide coverage with respect to the reconstruction of plaintiffs residence, which was destroyed by fire. The loss settlement provision of the policy states that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Harrington v. Amiga Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Town of Riverhead v. Central Pine Barrens Joint Planning & Policy CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Cooper v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Rice v. Cayuga-Onondaga Healthcare PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API