Nicholas Coffey v. Adam Carroll
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
READLER, Circuit Judge.
The qualified immunity doctrine serves to shield public officials-oftentimes, police officers-from liability and harassment for reasonable acts undertaken in the line of duty. As the doctrine affords a public official immunity from the costs of litigation, federal courts have an obligation to weigh the issue as early as practicable, and certainly no later than summary judgment. By the same token, where the law is settled and the record is murky as to whether an official has acted reasonably when judged against that settled legal standard, the claims are often left for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Lamar Wright v. City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Dwain Barton v. Officer MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Salvatore Palma, Jr. v. Matthew JohnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Cody Jones v. City of Elyria, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Robert Sean Reed v. Campbell Cnty., Ky.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.