Franklin v. State Ex Rel. Trammell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decree in equity condemning and ordering sold an automobile because it was used for the hauling of prohibited liquors and beverages in violation of Tit. 29, § 247, Code 1940.
The State contends that we should apply the principle that where the evidence was ore tenus, the conclusion of the trial court is given the same weight as a verdict of a jury and will not be disturbed on appeal, unless it is contrary to the great weight of the evidence.
This principle is not applicable here because the evidence is uncontroverted. Where the evidence is undisputed,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- King v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Bowling v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Salter v. HamiterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Jones v. WiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Coastal States Life Insurance Company v. GassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Berryhill v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.