Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Murray v. Lazarus

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1884No. 9176PublishedCited by 15 opinions

A IMPLICATION for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

This is an application for a mandemws.

The relator claims that he was arbitrarily refused an injunction on the face of a petition entitling him to one, duly sworn to and accompanied by a proper bond. He avers that his petition is in due form, that the judge had no discretion to exercise and was hound to grant the writ as a matter of right; hut that he illegally and wrongfully refused the same.

He annexes the' petition to the present application.

That petition relates- substantially, that the petitioner has complied with a judgment of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Middleton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Garrison v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  3. Appeal of ReberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Whiteside v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. McLeod v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State ex rel. Sorrel v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  5. City of Huron v. CampbellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API