Legal Opinion
Mann v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided February 18, 1994No. 93-0983-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
EDWARD B. DAVIS, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 27). The plaintiffs filed a response, and the defendants subsequently filed a reply. The Court heard oral argument on the motion on February 2,1994, after which the plaintiffs filed a supplemental response to the defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the motion and dismiss the complaint.
I. Standard of Review
Courts do not grant motions to dismiss unless they are convinced that the plaintiffs cannot prove a set of facts that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. RawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. ZweifelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vincent R. Tamburello v. Comm-Tract Corporation, John F. Polmonari, Edward Menard, and Steven DickieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Tamburello v. Comm-Tract Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Tamburello v. Comm-Tract Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995