Legal Opinion

Choate v. Swanson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1959No. 34836PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

The traffic signals at the intersection of 205th avenue north (secondary state highway No. 2-B) with Aurora avenue (primary state highway No. 1), in King county, as shown by the accompanying diagram, serve a dual purpose of (1) regulating traffic on Aurora avenue as it approaches the intersection from the north, south, east, and west, and (2) directing all such traffic destined for Edmonds into the Edmonds storage lane for a left turn off of Aurora avenue.

Those whose destination is Edmonds, and who are approaching on Aurora avenue from the south on the inside lane of travel, are confronted,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wise v. FardenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Nelson v. MartinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Holmes v. ToothakerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Drake v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Berger Engineering Co. v. HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hill v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of Bellevue v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. Paduano v. J. C. Boespflug Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. City of Bellevue v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API