Legal Opinion
Mesa v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 23, 1863PublishedCited by 13 opinions
This was a California land case, in which an appeal had been taken by the claimant and one Clark, an intervenor. The appellants suffered a term to pass without filing a copy of the record in this Court, but at the second term brought up the transcript and had it docketed.
1Per curiam
Let this appeal be dismissed. It has not been prosecuted in tbe manner directed nor within the time limited by the Act of Congress, which requires that the transcript shall be filed at the next succeeding term after the appeal is taken
2Cited by13 opinions
- Freeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Edmonson v. BloomshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Rubber Company v. GoodyearSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Grigsby v. PurcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Farmers' & Merchs.' Bank of L.A. v. DowneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.