Legal Opinion

Mink v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1927No. Appeals 194 and 195PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

These appeals are from judgments for plaintiffs in actions to recover for injuries sustained by one of them, wife of the other, resulting from defendant’s negligence. The assignments of error are numerous but without merit; little need be said in overruling them.

Mrs. Mink was a passenger on defendant’s street car. It stopped on Chestnut Street near 13th Street to permit passengers to alight. While alighting, she was preceded by several passengers and also followed by several. As she moved from the floor of the car to the car step, the doors suddenly and without warning, closed on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burns v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Dupont v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API