Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 3, 1992No. Record No. 2070-90-2Published

1Dissent

Benton, X,

dissenting.

In its case-in-chief, the Commonwealth was permitted to prove, over objection, that several months before James Matthew Miller shot *309Dean Scott Phillips, Miller was present in a classroom with Michael Waters and Matthew Scott Benson. Benson testified that the following occurred:

A We had a free day and we were just sitting around, talking. Us three guys were in a group, just talking, and we just brought it up. I believe I said something to the effect of how easy it might be to, you know, kill somebody and get away with it because we always talked about kind of weird stuff.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  2. Sutphin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
  3. Bunting v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  4. Limbaugh v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  5. Day v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API