Legal Opinion

Redfield v. First Nat. Bank of Brigham City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1925No. 1278Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

Appellant applies for a rehearing and assails the opinion on several grounds.

It is contended that the judgment obtained by the bank against appellant and which appellant on this appeal seeks to have vacated and set aside was void because it did not direct a sale of the stock and application of the proceeds before entering a personal judgment.

Appellant appears to ignore the fact that this is a pro ceeding in equity to vacate a judgment, and that it is incumbent upon him to bring his case within the rules required in such proceedings (Anderson v. State of Utah, 238…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Larson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Stockyards Nat. Bank of South Omaha v. BraggUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Russell v. ShurtleffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  4. Anderson v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Franklin v. ThatcherUtah Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API