Cornelius Williams, Jr. v. Corizon
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Cornelius Williams appeals after the district court 1 dismissed his complaint, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute or otherwise comply with court orders. He challenges the dismissal and argues he should have been appointed counsel.
Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did riot abuse its discretion in dismissing this action without prejudice. Williams’s failed to comply with court-ordered discovery deadlines and failed to appear for his noticed deposition, ignoring the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- James Edward Phillips v. Jasper County Jail Cabalero Eby Garza Kelly Forsythe Riley Moback Sanchez Sewell Lietz Lyman Carr John Freitas MarneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Aziz v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Lindstedt v. City Of GranbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Schooley v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Patrick Erisman and Debbie Erisman v. Summit Christian AcademyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2025