Meredith v. Meredith

*609Opinion op the Court by

Commissioner HObson—

Reversing.

The facts of this case are set out in the opinion on the former appeal, Meredith v. Meredith, 193 Ky. 192. It was then held that the demurrer to the defendant’s answer was improperly sustained. The answer alleged in substance that it was agreed between the parties that the royalty derived from the oil lease should be equally divided between Mrs. Meredith and her two sons, W. R. Meredith and J. E. Meredith, one-third to each, and that this agreement had been omitted from the deeds by mistake when the two sons made deeds to each other for the…