Lohman v. City of Aberdeen
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Justice.
Petitioners commenced mandamus proceedings to compel respondents to approve certain plats of land adjoining the city of Aberdeen. The trial court granted the writ, and respondents appeal. We reverse. 1
The matter was tried on seven different days over a period of four months. The record includes a bewildering number of plots and plot plans, sketches, drawings, maps, copies of maps, plats, preliminary plats, resolutions, and the like, some of which exhibits appear to be either duplica-tive or irrelevant.
Petitioner Dorothy J. Lohman owns a quarter section of land (the land)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Breckweg v. KnochenmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Tubbs v. LinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. SkinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- N. R. Fairbanks Co. v. City of BlaineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Wilmarth v. RitschlagSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by3 opinions
- Black Hills Central Railroad v. City of Hill CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Matters v. Custer CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Conrad v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986