People v. Charles F.
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentKaye, J.
While lay Judges unquestionably make a significant, valued contribution to the functioning *478of our judicial system, defendants facing imprisonment, with a complex array of constitutional and statutory rights, must have the option to be tried before law-trained Judges. This position is compelled by the holding of the United States Supreme Court in North v Russell (427 US 328), and consistent with the decision of this court in People v Skrynski (42 NY2d 218, 221).
In May, 1981 three informations were issued by the Conesus Town Court, charging appellant with criminal mischief in the fourth degree…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. ScheinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.