Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Charles F.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1983Published

1DissentKaye, J.

While lay Judges unquestionably make a significant, valued contribution to the functioning *478of our judicial system, defendants facing imprisonment, with a complex array of constitutional and statutory rights, must have the option to be tried before law-trained Judges. This position is compelled by the holding of the United States Supreme Court in North v Russell (427 US 328), and consistent with the decision of this court in People v Skrynski (42 NY2d 218, 221).

In May, 1981 three informations were issued by the Conesus Town Court, charging appellant with criminal mischief in the fourth degree…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. ScheinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API