Legal Opinion

Dinsfriend v. Fine Arts Express, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 31, 1996Published

1Opinion of the CourtSummerville, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the allowance of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm the decision of the motion judge.

Plaintiff Alan Dinsfriend, (“Dinsfriend”), a dealer in art, brought this action against the defendant, Fine Arts Express, Inc., (“FAE”), a common motor carrier, to recover the full value of two objets d’art (sculptures) damaged while in interstate transportation. Dinsfriend contracted with FAE to ship the artwork on two different occasions: first in November, 1993, and again in December, 1993. Unfortunately, the sculptures were damaged on both occasions.

A…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. North American Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Union Wire Rope Corporation v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API