Legal Opinion

Gillette v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Osborne District Court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Steang, C.:

Action to determine who is entitled to certain moneys in the hands of Cochrane & Farwell, as garnishees of the plaintiffs and defendants. Cochrane & Farwell, who resided at Osborne, Kas., were solicitors for certain loan companies, including the Kansas Mortgage Company, of Topeka, Kas. As such solicitors, they took the application of W. H. Mumford, of Osborne county, for a loan in the sum of $800, and forwarded it to said mortgage company. The company sent its land examiner to view the land, and, on receipt of his report, made out and forwarded to Cochrane & Farwell a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Ives v. AddisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. BarnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API