Legal Opinion

Kossler v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1904No. Appeal, No. 182PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal, No. 182, Oct. T., 1903, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1901, No. 473, on verdict for plaintiff in ease of William Kossler et al. v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. Appeal from award of jury of view. Before Colliee, J. From the record it appeared that the plaintiffs were owners of two adjoining tracts of land in the 34th ward of the city of Pittsburg.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 182, Oct. T., 1903, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1901, No. 473, on verdict for plaintiff in ease of William Kossler et al. v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. Appeal from award of jury of view. Before Colliee, J. From the record it appeared that the plaintiffs were owners of two adjoining tracts of land in the 34th ward of the city of Pittsburg. The light of way of the railroad was located, solely upon the larger of the two tracts. Upon it there had been a salt well with a plant equipped for the manufacture of salt.…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

This was a proceeding in the court below, to ascertain the amount of compensation to- which the plaintiffs were entitled, for certain property belonging to them, which had been appropriated by the defendant company, under the power of eminent domain. The land taken consisted of two tracts, the larger one, fronting on Steuben street, and having upon it an old *55salt water well. The smaller tract was in the rear of the other, and consisted of a narrow lot, extending through to Main street; and, according to the testimony, it had been purchased for the purpose of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Potts v. Penn. S. V. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Rudolph v. Pennsylvania Schuylkill Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ranck v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Rabe v. Shoenberger Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. McSorley v. Avalon Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. City of Chicago v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Morris v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API