Legal Opinion
Soliman v. Cepeda
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 20, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
269 N.J. Super. 151 (1993)
634 A.2d 1057
MICHAEL SOLIMAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROCIO CEPEDA AND BERGEN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County.
Decided July 20, 1993.
Thomas F. DiLullo for plaintiff (DiLullo, Sweeney & Cattani, attorneys; Mr. DiLullo, on the brief).
Daniel J. Cronin for defendant Rocio Cepeda, Bergen County Legal Services, (Richard S. Semel, Director, attorneys).
Terrence J. Corriston for defendant Bergen County Housing Authority (Breslin & Breslin, attorneys).
KOBLITZ, J.S.C.
Plaintiff Michael Soliman brings this summary dispossess action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marini v. IrelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Attorney General v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Liqui-Box Corp. v. Estate of ElkmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Mitchell v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- PLAZA ROAD CO-OP., INC. v. FinnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oak Glen of Edina v. BrewingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- TK v. Landmark WestNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Scott v. KaiuumAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2017
- Scott v. KaiuumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017