Mulholland v. Sterling Motor Truck Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiff’s amended bill in equity sought cancellation of four conditional sales contracts and a bailment lease and return of all money paid thereunder on the ground that at the time of entering into these contracts William P. Mulholland was a lunatic without lucid intervals. Testimony was taken before a chancellor, who found as a fact that, at the time of entering into each of the contracts, Mulholland was not a lunatic and was mentally capable of making contracts validly binding upon him. Plaintiff’s bill was accordingly dismissed. The chancellor’s findings and decree entered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Feuerstein v. New Century Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Harvey v. Turner & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
- Rubins v. HamnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Moore v. HersheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Mulholland v. Pittsburgh National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Youngwood Building & Loan Ass'n v. HenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Feely EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- United States v. KoenigDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.