Legal Opinion

United States v. Herndon

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 12, 1976No. CM 430760PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COSTELLO, Judge:

This Court’s first review of appellant’s conviction of rape disclosed an issue concerning the jury selection process. We ordered a limited hearing below to develop facts relevant to that issue. United States v. Herndon, 50 C.M.R. 166 (A.C.M.R.1975). Based on the facts reported from that hearing and our further review of the original pleadings, we find no error meriting relief.

Appellant now asserts that error occurred prior to the limited hearing we ordered, in that he was denied formal representation at that hearing by the action counsel who represented him…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. BellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  3. Kidd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  2. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. CrooksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API