Legal Opinion

Town of Oneida v. Pemberton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

By this proceeding Pemberton questions the right of the Town of Oneida to assess a corner lot which he owns for paving purposes, in excess of twenty-five per cent of its actual cash value.

By chapter 298 of the Private Acts of 1915, towns of the State having, a population of not less than 1.850 nor more than 2050 are authorized to create improvement districts for the purposes of opening, widening’, extending, grading, curbing, guttering, paving, gravelling, macadamizing, parking or laying permanent sewers. The act applies to the Town of Oneida.

Main Street in said town runs north and south, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Charlotte v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. City of Covington v. SchlosserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Carriger v. Mayor of MorristownTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Durst v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Rich v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Nashville v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  2. City of Williamsburg v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. City of ElizabethtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API