Starling v. Hamner

Without reciting or reviewing the conflicting testimony appearing in the record in this case, we announce our conclusion to he that the preponderance of this testimony establishes the following facts:

J. W. Starling was engaged in farming a tract of land which he had contracted to buy, and the title to which was involved in a suit argued and submitted on the same date on which the instant case was submitted in this court.

The Hamner-Edwards Company, hereinafter referred to as the company, made advances to Starling to enable Starling to cultivate the land, and these advances were secured by a…