Legal Opinion

Wasserman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 6, 1984No. 83-649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant’s conviction of disorderly conduct, under section 877.03, Florida Statutes (1981), is affirmed on the basis that her conduct, apart from her spoken words, supports the conviction. See White v. State, 330 So.2d 3, 6 (Fla.1976); Williams v. State, 340 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1017, 98 S.Ct. 737, 54 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); K.G. v. State, 338 So.2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

The state concedes that the sentencing order must be corrected so as to reflect the specific amount of credit time to which the defendant is entitled. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. K. G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Pruitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Wiltzer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. White v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API