Legal Opinion

Stanberry v. Cattell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Polla Qvrcuit Gou/rt. • Plaintiff presented "to the .Circuit Court, sitting as a court of probate, a claim against the estate of the defendant as administrator. The case was sent to a referee, and upon his report coming in judgment was rendered for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

3. paktnership : recovery by one partner against an-oi-bor: evidence. I. The plaintiff alleges in his claim, presented to the probate court for allowance, that he and defendant’s intestate were partners in the manufacture and sale of brick; that in payment for a large quantity of brick the firm received certain city lots which, with the assent of plaintiff, were conveyed to the *618decedent, who held the land in trust for the copartnership, and that afterwards intestate conveyed a part of the lots and received therefor $1,250, one half of which sum, with interest, plaintiff now claims to recover.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lord v. PeaksNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Beste v. BurgerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
  3. Dolan v. McManusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Foss v. DawesNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API