Legal Opinion · Dissent

Conoco, Inc. v. State Taxation & Revenue Department

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1995No. 15372Published

1DissentDonnelly, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the administrative hearing officer’s decision that upheld the State Taxation and Revenue Department’s denial of Taxpayer’s refund claims for the 1988,1989, and 1990 tax years and affirmed the imposition of additional taxes and penalties against Taxpayer for the 1991 tax year.

The Department concedes that New Mexico’s corporate income tax statute, as it applies to the separate entity method of reporting, is similar to Iowa’s corporate income tax scheme that was declared invalid by the United States Supreme Court in Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API