Legal Opinion

Cornelius v. Cornelius

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1932No. Appeal 100PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keeker., J.,

The decision of this appeal depends on the construction to be given the opinion of the Supreme Court in O’Malley v. O’Malley, 272 Pa. 528. If restricted to its narrowest limits, the judgment below should be reversed; if given a broader and liberal construction, it should be affirmed. As we read the opinion in that case it should be given the broader and liberal interpretation.

In this case, as in that, the parties, plaintiff and defendant, became the owners as tenants by entireties of the real estate in question. Subsequently they were divorced. For the purpose of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Malley v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wakefield v. WakefieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Stimson v. StimsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Ertel v. McCloskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Lipschutz v. LipschutzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Hoog v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API