Legal Opinion

Gesford v. Critzer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Trespass in the Scott Circuit Court, brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error. At the October term 1845, the Hon. Samuel D. Lockwood presiding, the defendants moved for and obtained a rule upon the plaintiff to give security for the costs. The rule not being complied with, the suit was dismissed.

1Opinion of the Court

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Purple J.

The plaintiff brought an action of trespass against the defendants in the Circuit Court of Scott county. At the October term 1845, the defendants filed an affidavit in the usual form, that the plaintiff was insolvent and unable to pay the costs of suit, and thereupon a rule was entered against the plaintiff to show cause why he should not give security for costs. The plaintiff filed his affidavit, stating therein that he was not insolvent; that he owned a house and lot in Iowa worth $300, and personal property in this State worth about $150,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. McLaughlin v. KippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. McLaughlin v. KippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Sims v. AtkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API