Legal Opinion

Goodman v. New York University

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. In support of the motion for summary judgment, the defendant university submitted a copy of its by-law 73 which clearly shows that the plaintiff, in his capacity as director of the United States Navy research project at the university, was not entitled to tenure or the benefits related to a tenured position. In addition, the motion papers contain a copy of the memorandum distributed to all persons connected *794with the project, including plaintiff, prior to its termination, informing them that they will not be entitled to severance pay. Plaintiff, on the other hand, submitted nothing…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schultz v. Acme Folding Box Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API