Legal Opinion

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Polin

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 10, 1970No. Nos. 18797, 18798PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

These petitions for writs of mandamus seek to compel the nominal respondent either “(1) to transfer the eases pending in the district court to the Eastern District of Missouri, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) or (2) rule finally upon the motion for transfer prior to the commencement of discovery upon the merits of the action.”

The lower court held that all matters of discovery should be fully completed before any action is taken on the said motion pending inquiry into the merits thereof either by discovery or by preliminary rulings on questions of law.

To undertake a…

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Ronald Madden v. Kevin Myers, Honorable Malcolm Muir, United States District Judge, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Saleh v. Titan Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2005
  5. Sierra Rutile Ltd. v. KatzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API