Legal Opinion

STATE Ex HESS v. AKRON (City) Et

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1936No. 2589PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATTHEWS, J.

This is an original action in mandamus to compel the officers of the city of Akron to take the necessary proceedings to pay from unappropriated funds in the city treasury to the relator the sum of $979.07, claimed to be due him as unpaid salary for services as deputy bailiff of the Mun'clpal Court of Akron during the years 1931, 1932, 1933 and 1934.

The case was presented upon the admissions in the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts.

In the legislative act creating the Municipal Court of Akron, the judges of that court were authorized to appoint such deputy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lehman v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Phillips v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glaser v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Pemberton v. Board of Edn. of City School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API