Legal Opinion

Voth v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 5, 2003No. CV-01-1256; A117764PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

The trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first supplemental complaint because he failed to provide timely tort claim notice. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff is in the custody of the Oregon Department of Corrections. He brought an action against various persons associated with the department, alleging that they had improperly released his private medical information and that they had provided him with substandard medical care. Plaintiff also alleged that he “has suffered * * * economic damages from the defendants, one and all, conduct alleged herein.” Based on those…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drake v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. McKenzie v. Pacific Health & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Sanok v. GrimesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. McKenzie v. Pacific Health & Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gambaro v. Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Schoene v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API