Legal Opinion

United States v. Vercher

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 24, 2004No. 03-3110PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Before us in the present appeal by the government is a challenge to the district court’s decision to grant Randall Terrell and Murnia Vercher’s motion to suppress evidence seized incident to a traffic stop. Determination of the matter rests on our evaluation of a single issue: Are the facts before us sufficient to support a Kansas highway trooper’s claim of reasonable suspicion that defendants violated a state traffic law? On our review of the record and authorities, we conclude that the government’s challenge is valid. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. WinderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. LudwigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. United States v. TibbettsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API