United States v. Vercher
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Before us in the present appeal by the government is a challenge to the district court’s decision to grant Randall Terrell and Murnia Vercher’s motion to suppress evidence seized incident to a traffic stop. Determination of the matter rests on our evaluation of a single issue: Are the facts before us sufficient to support a Kansas highway trooper’s claim of reasonable suspicion that defendants violated a state traffic law? On our review of the record and authorities, we conclude that the government’s challenge is valid. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. WinderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. LudwigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- United States v. TibbettsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.