FOREST PRESERVE DIST. OF KANE CTY. v. City of Aurora
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
Following a bench trial, the circuit court of Kane County held unconstitutional Public Act 86 — 267 and Public Act 86 — 1387, section 2, both of which amended section 6 of the Downstate Forest Preserve District Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 96½, par. 6309). A direct appeal was taken to this court by the State pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 302(a) (134 Ill. 2d R. 302(a)).
Effective August 21, 1989, Public Act 86 — 267 amended section 6 of the Downstate Forest Preserve District Act (the Act) by adding the following pertinent language:
“No [forest preserve] district with a population of less than…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The People v. RedlichIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
- Rios v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- First National Bank v. KusperIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Arrington v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Lindburg v. Zoning Board of AppealsIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Bartlow v. CostiganIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
- Perry v. Department of Financial & Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
- Perry v. Department of Financial and Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
- Kalven v. The City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.