Legal Opinion

FOREST PRESERVE DIST. OF KANE CTY. v. City of Aurora

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1992No. 72235PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

Following a bench trial, the circuit court of Kane County held unconstitutional Public Act 86 — 267 and Public Act 86 — 1387, section 2, both of which amended section 6 of the Downstate Forest Preserve District Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 96½, par. 6309). A direct appeal was taken to this court by the State pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 302(a) (134 Ill. 2d R. 302(a)).

Effective August 21, 1989, Public Act 86 — 267 amended section 6 of the Downstate Forest Preserve District Act (the Act) by adding the following pertinent language:

“No [forest preserve] district with a population of less than…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The People v. RedlichIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Rios v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. First National Bank v. KusperIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Arrington v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Lindburg v. Zoning Board of AppealsIllinois Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bartlow v. CostiganIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Perry v. Department of Financial & Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Perry v. Department of Financial and Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Kalven v. The City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API