Legal Opinion

Paine v. U.S. Government

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 9, 1987No. Misc. 87-0182Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEXLER, District Judge.

Petitioners Lloyd N. Paine III (“Paine”) and Bernd Hoffman, a.k.a. Phillip B. Paine (collectively the “taxpayers”) commenced this proceeding pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7609(b)(2)(A) to quash two Internal Revenue Service summonses (the “Summonses”) issued by the United States to third-party record keepers in possession of certain of Paine’s bank records. In response, the United States has moved, pursuant to the above-referenced statute, to compel compliance with the Summonses. For the reasons set forth below, the petitioners’ motion to quash is denied…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Grant Foster and Foster Construction C.A., Intervenors-Appellants v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. Wayne R. La Mura v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API