Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Singh

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 14, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01437Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01437-JLT-HBK 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 11 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED1 12 JASWANT SINGH, individually and dba OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS GRANT MARKET, RAJINDER KAUR, 13 individually and dba GRANT MARKET, (Doc. No. 10) 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. 18 Civ. P. 55(b) filed April 21, 2025. (Doc. No. 10, “Motion”). Defendants have not answered or 19…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Susan Cripps, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Doug Wander v. Jack S. Kaus Irene B. KausCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API