Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 2005No. 91,523PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

2Per curiam

The United States District Court for the District of Kansas certified two questions regarding the application of uninsured motorist coverage to a self-insured employer; (1) “Are [plaintiffs’] claims barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers Compensation Act,” and (2) “In Kansas, is a self-insurer required to provide uninsured motorist benefits to the occupants of its motor vehicles”?

On September 15, 1997, Roger Kandt was involved in an automobile accident in Wichita, Kansas. At the time of the accident, Kandt was driving a motor vehicle…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. GT, Kansas, L.L.C. v. Riley County Register of DeedsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Stonewall InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Danisco Ingredients USA, Inc. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. Overbaugh v. StrangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cady v. SchrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Redmond v. KesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. State v. SnellingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. BruceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. Stemple v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API