Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1895No. Appeal, No. 57PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal, No. 57, Oct. T., 1895, by-plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Venango Co., entering non-suit. Trespass for personal injuries. Before Taylor, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was entry of nonsuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Wiblliams,

This appeal is from a judgment entered upon a compulsory nonsuit. The question raised by it is whether the existence of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff is, upon the evidence that was before the court, a question of law upon which it was proper for the court to pass, or a question of fact to be submitted to the jury?

It may be stated as a general proposition that where the facts are simple and the evidence by which they are presented is involved in no uncertainty their legal value is for the court to determine; but where the evidence is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Myers v. B. & O. R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Marland v. Pittsb. & L. E. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. McNeal v. Pittsb. & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Ellis v. Lake Shore Etc. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Whitman v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Wolf v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Muckinhaupt v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Wood v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Nichol v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API