Legal Opinion

Natasha R. Hill v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2015No. 49A05-1407-CR-314PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issues

Following a bench trial, Natasha Hill was convicted of two counts of theft and ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $2526.83. Hill appeals, raising two issues for our review: (1) whether her dual theft convictions, which were based upon acts committed minutes apart and in the same department store, are contrary to law; and (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering Hill to pay restitution. Concluding Hill’s dual convictions violate Indiana’s single larceny rule and that the trial court’s restitution order was an abuse of discretion,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bartlett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Kays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Raines v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Polen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Logan M. Dull v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Justine Archer v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Kent Akins v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Steven Linville v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Chasity M. Turpen v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API