Bunberry v. Brett

This was an action of replevin for a span of horses, wagon and harness, by Bunberry, against Brett. #Issue, trial, verdict and judgment for the defendant.

Bunberry owned the property; but it was claimed by the defendant, that Bunberry sold it to one Hughes, who sold it to the defendant. It appears pretty' clearly from the evidence, which is before us, that Bunberry made a contract for the sale of the property to Hughes for the sum of 350 dollars, a part of which was paid down, and the residue to be paid at a future day; but that the title to the property was not to pass to Hughes until the…