Legal Opinion

Victory Fireworks & Specialty Co. v. Commercial Novelty Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 21, 1939No. 2449PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge. ■

In this patent infringement suit in equity an interlocutory decree was filed December 16, 1936, holding that the plaintiffs’ patent sued on was valid and had been infringed by the defendant; that an injunction should issue against continued infringement; and referring the case to W. Ainsworth Parker, as special master, to take and state an account of profits and damages from past infringement. The ac-. companying opinion, including findings of fact and conclusions of law, is reported in D.C., 16 F.Supp. 969. An appeal was taken by the defendant resulting in an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Drum v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  4. Hartford-Empire Co. v. Swindell Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  5. Union Shipbuilding Co. v. Boston Iron & Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API