Victory Fireworks & Specialty Co. v. Commercial Novelty Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge. ■
In this patent infringement suit in equity an interlocutory decree was filed December 16, 1936, holding that the plaintiffs’ patent sued on was valid and had been infringed by the defendant; that an injunction should issue against continued infringement; and referring the case to W. Ainsworth Parker, as special master, to take and state an account of profits and damages from past infringement. The ac-. companying opinion, including findings of fact and conclusions of law, is reported in D.C., 16 F.Supp. 969. An appeal was taken by the defendant resulting in an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Drum v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. Swindell Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Union Shipbuilding Co. v. Boston Iron & Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963