Legal Opinion

State v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On certiorari. One Catharine Hutchinson filed a complaint before Jesse Pratt, mayor of Camden, sitting as a magistrate. The complaint stated, that one William H. Anderson was a disorderly person at the residence of the complainant, No. 251 Pine street, and did then and there call her a “ Gr—d d—n bitch,” contrary to section 298 of an ordinance entitled “An ordinance revising the ordinances of the city of Camden,” passed December 30th, 1886, and against the peace of the city,…

Read the full summary

On certiorari. One Catharine Hutchinson filed a complaint before Jesse Pratt, mayor of Camden, sitting as a magistrate. The complaint stated, that one William H. Anderson was a disorderly person at the residence of the complainant, No. 251 Pine street, and did then and there call her a “ Gr—d d—n bitch,” contrary to section 298 of an ordinance entitled “An ordinance revising the ordinances of the city of Camden,” passed December 30th, 1886, and against the peace of the city, the government and dignity of the same. A warrant was issued, and upon the said Anderson being brought before the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

Section 298 of the ordinance alluded to in the above complaint reads thus: “All persons who shall make, aid, countenance or assist in making any improper noise, riot, disturbance or breach of the peace in the streets and highways or elsewhere within the city, and all persons who shall collect in bodies or crowds for idle or unlawful purposes, to the annoyance or disturbance of citizens or travelers, shall severally. forfeit and pay a fine of $5.” This ordinance was passed in pursuance of the authority given council by revised charter of the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BergschickerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Peer v. DixonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. City of St. Paul v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. City of St. Paul v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API