Commonwealth v. Battaglia
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
EAKIN, J.:
¶ 1 Michael Battaglia appeals from the judgment of sentence entered following his convictions for obstructing highways, harassment, and violating a borough ordinance, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. When a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence is made, our task is to determine whether the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict winner, was sufficient to enable the factfinder to find every element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Commonwealth v. Zambelli, 695 A.2d 848, 851 (Pa.Super.1997). We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WheatonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. ZambelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. ZullingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. SnyderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LutesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Com. v. Coniker, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Commonwealth v. Stone & Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Com. v. Coniker, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Barton, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.