Legal Opinion

Don B. Cook v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1971No. 30359PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to vacate judgment and sentence in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.

Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that entry or attempted entry of a federally insured bank at a time when the bank’s premises are unoccupied, does not as a matter of law constitute a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). 1

The identical question was presented in United States v. Poindexter, 6th Cir. 1961, 293 F.2d 329, at 330, which held that “[i]t makes no difference whether the offense is committed when the bank is open for business…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. George Ershin Poindexter, United States of America v. Fay Albert Carrell, United States of America v. Melvin Glen MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  2. Roger Wayne Williams v. United States of America, Victor Otto Oreskovich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Don B. Cook v. United States of America, No. 30359 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API