Dahlem v. Abbott

Grant, O. J.

This case is before us the second time. A full statement can be found in the opinion then rendered. (146 Mich. 605.)

Defendant Abbott, upon the first trial, claimed under *466a tax title and title by adverse possession. It was held that he had not acquired title by adverse possession, and that he could not under the facts there disclosed acquire a valid tax title as against plaintiff and the other defendants. The judgment was reversed and a new trial ordered. Upon the second trial plaintiff produced two deeds, one made to Vesula Converse and the other to Virsula Converse. Counsel for…