Reed v. Brae Railcar Management, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
The defendant has moved under Rule 12(b)(3) to dismiss for improper venue or in the alternative under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer this action to the Northern District of California “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses [and] in the interests of justice.” For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is denied and the motion to transfer is granted.
I. Background 1
The plaintiffs are the co-executors of the estate of Arthur Rubloff, a successful Chicago real estate developer. In October 1979, Rubloff purchased eighty-three…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Scott Turnock v. Arthur Cope, James Jones and George AuchterloineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Liudas Kairys, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Kairys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- VMS/PCA Ltd. Partnership v. PCA Partners Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Vanguard Financial Service Corp. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Emjayco v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1995
- Zughni v. PenaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Mark Schwartz v. Electronic Data Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.