State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Woodrich
Oregon Supreme Court
1Concurrence
LINDE, J.,
specially concurring.
The court reaffirms that a defendant who offers a defense of mental disease or defect, ORS 161.295-161.305, cannot be compelled in a psychiatric examination under ORS 161.315 to answer questions "concerning his conduct relating to the offense charged.” Shepard v. Bowe, 250 Or 288, 290, 442 P2d 238 (1968). This ruling is sufficient to dispose of the present case, and I concur. However, this exception from a defendant’s obligation to answer questions does not exhaust the defendant’s privilege not to be compelled to testify against himself, Or. Const, art. I, § 12.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Shepard v. BoweOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. GraysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.